Shelves

Performance

Cover of The Other Olympians

The Other Olympians

United States · 2020s

8 ideas

Buy on Amazon

The history of early trans and intersex Olympians shows how institutions defined and policed athletic bodies.

  1. Policing a threat that never existed

    A whole system of checks can be built to stop a fraud nobody was committing. The athletes who transitioned had left women's competition and never wanted to return to it. Yet officials read their stories as proof that men were sneaking into women's events, and they demanded mandatory exams.

  2. Rules that assume two sealed boxes

    Sex testing depends on treating "men" and "women" as two fully separate, fixed categories. Experts of the same era said the opposite: no man is 100 percent male and no woman 100 percent female. A rule built on that false premise sorts people badly by design.

  3. Extreme regimes write lasting rules

    A rule written under a particular regime can outlive that regime by generations. Today's athletic sex testing traces back to a request by a Nazi sports doctor for the 1936 Berlin Games. It was shaped by fascist ideology, the period's ideas about sex, and ambitious officials, and the same rules still drive present-day fights in courts and legislatures.

  4. A test with no defined target

    A screening rule can be launched before anyone agrees on what it is meant to catch. Early sex testing never settled whether it targeted disguised men, intersex bodies, muscular or tall women, or particular anatomy. Its aims stayed "murky" from the start, so the test could not say what its results should mean.

  5. Overlooking atrocity to secure an event

    Leaders who want an event to go ahead badly enough will look past the host's crimes, and that partnership can shape their own institution for decades. Olympic officials ignored Nazi Germany's atrocities to stage the Berlin Games. That alliance fed the movement's near-century-long fixation on surveilling and cataloguing gender.

  6. Losers' complaints become official policy

    Grumbling from rivals who lost can turn into formal screening when powerful officials want it. Coaches and runners-up cried foul over losses to "manly" women. Officials then used press frenzies over individual athletes to bring in exams, and some of them simply disliked women athletes they found unattractive.

  7. Acceptance can come before backlash

    Openness toward a minority can be real and still be reversed soon after. Early athletes who transitioned were readily accepted as men, had their papers changed, and briefly became celebrated. Within a few years, that visibility fed the anxieties that produced exclusionary testing.

  8. Separate spaces built from inside

    Excluded groups often win access by building their own space within an institution, not by tearing it down. Women barred from major competitions created parallel leagues and games. Those were later absorbed, and the absorbing body then debated which events women could safely be allowed.

Save ideas and give them a thumbs up or down in the app