The Shock of the New

Robert Hughes

6 ideas

  1. Cubism as response to machine-age perception

    Hughes reads Cubism's fractured, multi-viewpoint pictures as the pictorial equivalent of a world newly reshaped by trains, cars, telegraphs, cinema and flight, technologies that fragmented and multiplied the experience of time and space. The style's radical form is explained as a record of changed conditions of seeing, not as the private invention of isolated genius.

  2. Eiffel Tower as emblem of modern optimism

    Hughes opens with the Eiffel Tower of 1889. It was a useless iron structure celebrated as a triumph of engineering, and it became the symbol of an era's confidence that technology would deliver a better, faster future. Around 1900 the machine was seen as a benevolent promise rather than a threat, and that optimism fueled the first avant-garde energies.

  3. The avant-garde was absorbed by the market

    The avant-garde defined itself through its power to shock and oppose bourgeois taste. Once collectors, museums and dealers learned to buy and institutionalize novelty itself, shock became a commodity and opposition became a career path. By the late 1970s, Hughes argues, the avant-garde's promise of cultural renewal had been neutralized by the very system it claimed to attack.

  4. Utopian architecture failed its inhabitants

    Modernist architects such as Le Corbusier and the Bauhaus believed rational, standardized buildings would produce rational, better societies. In practice their principles, applied at scale in public housing and planned cities, produced alienating environments that ignored how people actually live. The failure exposed the arrogance of designing for an abstract 'new man' rather than for existing human needs.

  5. Art's political power is largely illusory

    Hughes tests modernism's recurring claim that art can change society, from Futurism and Russian Constructivism to Dada and Surrealism. He finds that paintings rarely moved politics, and when regimes took art seriously it was usually to co-opt or suppress it. Art's real power, in his account, lies in shaping individual perception and feeling, not in engineering revolution.

  6. First World War destroys faith in machines

    The Futurists had glorified speed, machines and war as hygiene for a stale culture. The mechanized slaughter of 1914–18 turned the machine from a symbol of progress into an instrument of mass death. Dada's absurdist anti-art emerged directly from that disillusionment, as a refusal of the rational order that had produced the trenches.

Save and mark ideas in the app