The Art and Architecture of Islam 1250–1800

Sheila Blair and Jonathan Bloom

3 ideas

  1. Mongol conquest spread Chinese motifs westward

    The Mongol empire united China and Iran under related Ilkhanid and Yuan rulers, and diplomats, merchants and craftsmen moved along the connected routes. Portable objects such as textiles, porcelain and paper carried Chinese motifs like lotuses, peonies, dragons and phoenixes into Iranian manuscript painting, ceramics and tilework. The destruction of the conquest was therefore followed by a period of artistic renewal built on imported visual vocabulary.

  2. Kitabkhana as engine of dynastic style

    Timurid, Safavid, Ottoman and Mughal courts ran a royal library-workshop, the kitabkhana or nakkashane, where calligraphers, illuminators and painters worked under a supervising master. Designs made on paper in this studio were passed to carpet weavers, tile makers, bookbinders and metalworkers. This is why a single court style appears across media that use very different materials.

  3. Reading architecture as dynastic statement

    Large mosques, tombs and complexes built by rulers are best understood as public claims to legitimacy, piety and imperial identity, and less as neutral answers to a building's function. Examples include the Ottoman central-dome mosques that answer Hagia Sophia, Timur's enormous Samarqand buildings, and the Mughal garden tombs that culminate in the Taj Mahal. Choices of scale, plan and inscription show whom a dynasty wanted to rival or claim as its predecessor.

Save and mark ideas in the app