Cover of Ten Days in a Mad-House

Ten Days in a Mad-House

Nellie Bly

4 ideas

  1. Reporter Feigns Insanity, Exposes Blackwell's Island

    In 1887, 23-year-old Nellie Bly, on assignment for Joseph Pulitzer's New York World, practiced looking deranged, checked into a women's boarding house as 'Nellie Brown', and acted confused and frightened until police were called. A judge and several doctors pronounced her insane, and she was committed to the Women's Lunatic Asylum on Blackwell's Island. There she recorded ice-cold baths, spoiled food, freezing rooms, beatings and threats from nurses, and forced sitting in silence for hours. After ten days the World's lawyer got her released, and her articles prompted a grand jury investigation and a large increase in the city's budget for the Department of Public Charities and Correction.

  2. Once labeled insane, sane behavior becomes evidence

    Bly stopped acting mad as soon as she reached the asylum and behaved normally, yet no doctor or nurse noticed she was sane. Staff read her normal requests, protests and questions through the diagnosis, so her attempts to prove her sanity were treated as further symptoms. The label, not the behavior, decided how she was seen, which made the diagnosis close to impossible to escape from inside.

  3. Asylum conditions manufacture the madness they claim to treat

    Bly argued that the regime of cold, hunger, enforced idleness, silence and fear would break a sane woman's mind within two months. The institution therefore produced the deterioration it then pointed to as proof that confinement was justified. She met several inmates, including poor immigrant women who could not make themselves understood in English, who appeared sane when admitted and were being worn down by the treatment.

  4. Commitment tracks poverty and powerlessness, not illness

    The committal process ran on cursory exams by doctors who spent minutes with each patient and a court system that deferred to them. Women without money, English, family or advocates had no way to contest the diagnosis. The book reframes the asylum as a place where society put inconvenient, poor and foreign women, showing that who ends up confined depends on who can push back rather than on who is ill.

Save and mark ideas in the app