Money Men

4 ideas

1. Wirecard's nonexistent Asian profits and €1.9bn

   Wirecard, a DAX-listed German payments processor, reported that much of its profit came from 'third-party acquiring' partners in Dubai, Singapore and the Philippines, with the resulting cash said to sit in escrow accounts at Philippine banks. After years of FT reporting, a Singapore whistleblower's documents on round-tripped and backdated transactions, and a KPMG special audit that could not verify the business, the banks said the €1.9bn did not exist. Wirecard collapsed into insolvency in June 2020, CEO Markus Braun was arrested, and COO Jan Marsalek fled.

2. Regulators may protect champions against critics

   Germany's financial regulator BaFin investigated the reporters and short sellers rather than the company. In 2019 it banned short selling of Wirecard shares and filed a criminal complaint against FT journalists for alleged market manipulation. When a regulator treats a listed company as a national asset, the attack on its critics works as an official signal that the allegations are false, and that delays the exposure of the fraud.

3. The short-seller conspiracy counter-narrative

   An accused company can recast every critic as part of a coordinated attack by short sellers seeking profit. This moves attention from whether the numbers are real to the motives of whoever asks. Lawsuits, hired private investigators, surveillance and hacking attempts back the narrative up, raising the personal cost of asking questions until only the most determined investigators persist.

4. Follow profits no outsider can verify

   The tell in a fraudulent business is often where its reported profit sits. If profit sits in outsourced partners, opaque acquisitions or cash held by third parties that no one independently confirms, that is where to look. Asking to see the cash and the customers directly, rather than accepting audited summaries, is the test that eventually broke the story.

Save and mark ideas in the app