Karachi: Ordered Disorder and the Struggle for the City

Laurent Gayer

6 ideas

  1. Ordered disorder as routinised, regulated violence

    Chronic violence in a megacity does not have to mean collapse. Rival armed actors operate by tacit rules: limits on targets, recognised territories, negotiated truces, and predictable escalations. These rules keep conflict persistent but bounded, so the city stays governable and economically functional while never being pacified.

  2. Extortion functions as a parallel taxation system

    Protection money (bhatta) collected by parties, gangs and militant groups works like informal taxation. It is levied regularly, scaled to a business's capacity, and exchanged for real if coercive protection. Traders often treat it as a predictable cost of doing business, which is how extortion and commerce coexist rather than one destroying the other.

  3. Armed political parties as hybrid organisations

    Karachi's major parties, most notably the MQM, combine electoral politics, welfare provision, and militant wings that hold neighbourhoods by force. Their ballot power and their coercive capacity reinforce each other. The same organisation can govern the city through elected office while its enforcers fight turf wars in the streets.

  4. The state as participant, not arbiter

    The Pakistani state does not stand above Karachi's conflicts as a neutral enforcer. Its agencies ally with some armed actors against others, run periodic 'operations' that selectively target rivals, and tolerate violence that serves their interests. Seen this way, security crackdowns reshuffle the balance of power among combatants instead of ending the conflict.

  5. Lyari gangs turning into political patrons

    In Lyari, Baloch criminal gangs led by figures like Rehman Dakait and later Uzair Baloch moved from drug dealing and extortion into community patronage. Through the People's Aman Committee they allied with the PPP, delivered votes, and ran informal justice. The case shows how criminal entrepreneurs gain legitimacy by filling gaps in welfare and security, then become too entangled with party politics to be simply suppressed.

  6. Urban competence for navigating violent cities

    Residents cope with chronic insecurity through learned, practical skills. They read ethnic markers, map no-go areas, time their movements around strikes and unrest, and know whom to pay or call. This shared tacit knowledge turns diffuse danger into manageable risk, and it is part of what keeps daily life and the economy running despite pervasive violence.

Save and mark ideas in the app