Cover of Crímenes imperceptibles

Crímenes imperceptibles

Guillermo Martínez

3 ideas

  1. The Oxford murders staged as series

    In 1993 Oxford, an Argentine mathematics graduate student finds his landlady, Mrs. Eagleton, a former wartime codebreaker, dead. The logician Arthur Seldom has received a note announcing the first of a series marked by a circle, and further deaths follow, each announced by a new symbol (a fish shape, a triangle, a Pythagorean tetraktys). Seldom later reveals that the first death was a domestic killing inside the Eagleton household, that the later deaths were natural, and that he invented the 'series' to disguise it. The fiction then inspired a real killer who acted out the pattern, causing actual deaths.

  2. Finite series underdetermine their continuation

    Any finite sequence of terms is consistent with infinitely many rules, so no set of observed cases can logically fix the next term. Whoever claims to have 'found the pattern' has chosen one continuation for its simplicity or elegance, not proved it. This is the rule-following problem from Wittgenstein, applied to detection and induction.

  3. Imperceptible crimes versus the perfect crime

    The book separates two ideas. Seldom defines the perfect crime as a case that is solved and closed, but with the wrong culprit. The imperceptible crime is a death that passes as natural or accidental and so is never investigated as a crime at all.

Save and mark ideas in the app