A Narrative of the Treatment Experienced by a Gentleman

John Perceval

4 ideas

  1. Prime Minister's son confined in asylums

    John Perceval was the son of the assassinated British Prime Minister Spencer Perceval. In 1830–31 he fell into religious enthusiasm and heard commanding voices, and his family had him confined at Edward Long Fox's Brislington House and later at Ticehurst until 1834. He was strapped down, straitjacketed, plunged into cold baths and handled by keepers who never explained anything to him. He later published a detailed indictment of this treatment and went on to campaign for asylum reform through the Alleged Lunatics' Friend Society.

  2. The madman still perceives and remembers

    A person in psychosis is not an absent mind. Perceval registered, judged and later recalled every indignity done to him. Because his keepers assumed he could not understand, they acted on him without explanation or consent, and this treatment as an object wounded and disoriented him further. What he asked for was to be addressed as a rational agent even while his reason was disordered.

  3. Voices spoke in metaphor, heard literally

    Perceval's hallucinated voices issued commands that he obeyed as literal instructions, which drove him into absurd and dangerous acts. Part of his recovery came from realising that the voices often spoke figuratively or conditionally, and that his madness lay partly in mistaking poetic meaning for literal command. Seen this way, psychosis is partly an error in how messages are classified, not only a matter of what they contain.

  4. Coercive regimes manufacture their own evidence

    The asylum met the patient with silence, restraint and physical force. That treatment provoked the anger, resistance and despair which the keepers then read as further proof of insanity, justifying more coercion. The institution thereby produced the symptoms it claimed to be treating, and it blocked the patient's own efforts to recover.

Save and mark ideas in the app