A Half-Built Garden

Ruthanna Emrys

4 ideas

  1. First contact in the Chesapeake watershed

    In 2083, Judy Wallach-Stevens, a data analyst for a consensus-governed watershed network, investigates what looks like a pollution anomaly and finds an alien ship landed near Bear Island on the Potomac, within the Chesapeake watershed. The aliens, called the Ringers, offer to evacuate humanity to their space habitats because they believe planets become death traps for intelligent species. Watershed networks, corporations exiled to artificial islands, and remnant nation-states then compete to be the ones who answer for humanity.

  2. Watershed-bounded networked consensus governance

    Political units are drawn around ecological systems, such as river basins, rather than national borders, so the people who share consequences also share decisions. Networked software gathers and weighs distributed input until a working consensus emerges, which replaces elected representatives. The design trades speed for legitimacy, so a sudden external shock forces it either to find fast consensus or to let individuals act on the group's behalf.

  3. Planetary doom depends on whose history counts

    The Ringers conclude from their own past that tool-using species always ruin their home worlds, so they treat leaving as the only rational choice. The humans answer with a counter-record: their institutions have been actively repairing a damaged Earth. Whether a civilization is judged doomed or recoverable turns on which historical sample is treated as the base rate, and on whether new institutions are allowed to count as evidence that breaks the pattern.

  4. Birthing mothers as the aliens' authority marker

    The Ringers treat those who have given birth as the natural decision-makers, a biological test that cuts across the ways human families actually share child-rearing. Because they apply their own marker of legitimacy, they pick different speakers than the watersheds' consensus institutions would choose. The mismatch shows how the question of who speaks for a group can be settled by an outsider's convention rather than by the group's own.

Save and mark ideas in the app